Monday, August 10, 2020

Robert Browning's views on religion

 

The views of Robert Browning concerning religion is one of the most fascinating subjects when it comes to the works of Victorian poets. This is because it involves a situation where there is no stable stance on the subject throughout his works to such an extent that there have been radically different views concerning the subject. A prominent aspect of Browning’s poetry is that it shows the ever-shifting attitudes that he has concerning religion and this can be considered an essential part of the various events that took place in his life (Turner 5). It can also be considered a means through which he expressed his inner thoughts concerning the way individuals in society responded to religion. Browning’s works are important because they show that rather than having consistent thoughts about religion, individuals ‘attitudes often change with the events, whether positive or negative, that take place in their lives. These individuals instead seek to make sure that they understand the purpose of religion and the role that it plays in their lives. Browning, through his poetry, challenges the social conformity towards religion that is prevalent in his society and this is to such an extent that very few individuals are able to challenge the institutions of religion. In this paper, there will be an analysis of Robert Browning’s views on religion through an assessment of his life experiences as well as his works, with specific reference to “The Bishop Orders His Tomb”, “Fra Lippo Lippi”, and “Porphyria’s Lover”.

Robert Browning was born in 1812 to a well to do family in England, with his family background being quite extensive because it included German, Scottish, and a paternal grandmother believed to be of mixed origin. He lived in an environment where his parents encouraged him to have considerable freedom of thought to such an extent that he was able to develop independent thought at a very early age. Furthermore, he became interested in the arts from a young age and this was essential in the advancement of his ideas concerning the society within which he lived. Browning’s life was one where because of his father’s good income was able to have an environment and the necessities that he needed to further his career as a poet (Gale). It was fundamental in helping to advance his initiatives because it allowed him to ensure that he made a careful study of his society, mostly because of his mother’s influence, and discover some of the different contradictions that plagued it. He was essentially taught at home because he hated the school environment and did not attend either Oxford or Cambridge because at the time, admission was only allowed for Anglicans while he was raised an evangelical. It is fundamental that Browning became so much involved in addressing the matter of religion in his poetic works, and this is especially the case following his marriage to Elizabeth Barrett, a sickly woman. His marriage was what brought him to the limelight because his wife was more well known in the literary circles at the time, and their decision to move to Italy for the sake of her health can be considered a testament of his love for her.

In his youth, Browning displayed considerable flexibility when it came to his religious beliefs. He was an individual who, despite being raised in a deeply religious environment, with his mother being an evangelical and a non-conformist. She, however, promoted her son’s interests in matters other than religion through her buying him the works of Shelley, who was a well-known atheist. A result was that for a time, Browning, who greatly admired Shelley, became both an atheist and a vegetarian, like his hero (Suzuki 63). However, despite this shift in belief, Browning seems to not have held on to it for a long time and it is possible that his shifting stance in his early youth was essentially a young man trying to find himself. Browning can be considered to have been quite openminded when it came to religious beliefs in his youth and it is this attitude that essentially guided him for the rest of his life. His flexibility when it came to religious beliefs does not seem to have prevented him from undertaking different works and it is possible that he sought to better understand religious beliefs through his works. His religious beliefs, which were at first moulded on that of his own family, must have been significantly challenged by the social realities around him and may have contributed to his not being too attached to conventional beliefs in his life. Therefore, while he may not have remained an atheist for long, Browning seems to have live in a situation where religion did not play a significant role in his youth.

Browning is an individual whose religious beliefs significantly changed as he grew older. This is especially considering that he lived at a time where a considerable number of people essentially conformed to the religious beliefs in which they were raised. However, Browning was among those whose beliefs were everchanging because he had the ability to question and criticise the dominant aspects of religion in his society. Browning’s works show an individual who despite being much concerned with religion did not address it himself. Instead, he made the various characters within his works make their own declarations concerning religion and its purpose. In this way, he was able to ensure that he created a level of debate concerning religion and how it affected the daily lives of individuals. Browning’s religious stance can be considered to have become more consistent as he grew older and during this period, it was affected more by the events that took place in his life rather than being based on any firm religious principles. He was an individual who showed a propensity towards the belief that religion could be a source of good in society and showed an admiration for the manner in which the bible promoted goodness. However, the different events that took place in his life, such as the death of his wife, may have significantly reduced his faith in religion to such an extent that he was seen as having rejected the very idea of its authenticity.

One of the most significant influences on Browning were the works of John Donne. While he had lived in the 17th century, his works were essentially considered little more than uncouth. However, Browning went against the grain by admiring and idolising Donne, much to the surprise of his contemporaries (Gale). Browning’s admiration for Donne may have stemmed from the latter’s quite liberal perspective of the world, which was not popular during his time. His free discussion of such subjects as love and the manner through which he described the various subjects that he wrote about, were considered uncouth during his own time. However, Browning seems to have admired this individuals because of the daring that he had in being able to challenge the social conventions of the seventeenth century and seeking to think outside of the religious and social restrictions that had been placed on individuals in the society. Browning can be considered to also have been a liberal in a period where there seem to have been considerable social restrictions in addition to open hostility when it came to individuals going against what were considered correct religious practices. Therefore, Donne’s influence of Browning cannot be underestimated since it may have been the catalyst that made the latter venture into the way of thinking, in a liberal manner, that served as a hallmark of his works. Donne’s poetry also seems to have been responsible for the style that was later adopted by Browning in his own poetic works. Therefore, Donne was an important influence on Browning because the latter idolised him and his way of thinking, and this influence may have also been important when it came to Browning’s opinions concerning society and the role of religion within it.

The image of Faust plays a prominent role in the poetry of Robert Browning. This is because he is used to symbolise the poet, as is the case where this individual uses unconventional means to achieve his goals. Faust’s use of black magic, and the manner through which Browning makes him a symbol of the poet shown that the latter may have been experiencing a situation where his religious beliefs had taken a downturn. Faust’s life is highly symbolic of the need by human beings to take responsibility for their own lives and do what they can to ensure that they are in full possession of their destinies. Faust is therefore symbolic of the ability of human beings to control their lives without the intervention of religion. However, Browning seems to have lost interest in using Faust to symbolise the poet, with this role being given to Elisha. It shows that the considerable reversal that Browning experiences when it comes to his opinion concerning religion. When one considers that Faust was eventually condemned for his actions, his replacement by Elisha is extremely important. Elisha’s miracle, where he resurrected the son of the Shunamite woman is consistent with Browning’s regaining of his religious beliefs. It is symbolic of the revival of those instances where individuals, after having lose their faith and regained it, constantly seek to ensure that they attain the highest possible level of religious observance. Faust and Elisha in this case can be considered symbolic of the opposite religious inclinations that affect Browning from throughout his life.

Moreover, Browning is shown to be an individual who considered death to be imminent for all individuals. His works show a significant attempt to address death and the manner that it comes about. Therefore, while the world is a beautiful place to live in, despite the problems that can be found within it, it is inevitable that death will eventually find us and that with death, the world will cease to be of any use. Browning’s opinion of death can be seen in the way that he seems to be abandoning the prophetic role that he undertook when he me Elisha the representation of the poet. This abandonment is extremely symbolic of Browning’s significant belief that death will eventually come and that human beings do not have the power to resist it. The achievement of the goals of religion is to ensure that there is the advancement of the lives of individuals in such a way that they are able to achieve salvation after their deaths. Therefore, it is essential that humans seek to redeem themselves because at death, the beauty of the world opens up, and despite the desire to continue living within it, death denies them the ability to achieve this objective. It is possible that Browning was of the belief that human beings had to make the most of being alive through undertaking those tasks that they believed to be important while at the same time living righteously. This is especially considering that death is constantly imminent and it is likely to come about without warning.

It seems that Browning believes individuals in the world can only be able to achieve salvation through the observance of divine love. He further suggests that human beings are constantly shown evidence of divine power, but while the latter is in evidence, there is a failure to realise that it is important for it to be tempered with divine love (Steward). A consequence of this stance is that it promotes the belief that individuals should take responsibility for their actions in such a way that it allows them to view the world differently. It is likely that Browning is essentially condemning the selfish nature of human beings because he suggests that individuals do not do enough to promote the advancement of love in their societies. They instead seek to ensure that they accomplish their own selfish interests at the expense of others. The matter of salvation can also be considered a means through which Browning condemns the church establishment, especially the monopoly of power that is displayed by clergymen. The latter are essentially representations of all that is wrong with the world because rather than promoting the idea of divine love in society, they cause the considerable restrictions within it based on doctrinal differences. Thus, salvation can only be achieved through individual action, which is essential in the advancement of love in such a way that it becomes one of the sole purposes of human beings. A consequence would be that evidence of divine power tempered with that of divine love would ensure that salvation becomes a reality for a considerable number of individuals.

Browning is an individual who believes in the power of morality. It is an important belief because he believed in the artists making use of their works to advance morality. This is fundamental because the process involved artists being able to undertake the role of social conscience in their societies. Furthermore, when it came to morality, Browning often made use of biblical allusions to get his point across to his audience. He seems to advance the need to make sure that a situation is brought about where society is able to learn from the work of artists concerning the need to lead moral lives. The achievement of this goal can be considered fundamental because it shows the artist as not only an individual who entertains his audience, but also provides them with essential moral lessons concerning life. Browning sees his role as a poet as a means of lending society with the knowledge that they need to live morally while at the same time ensuring that there is the advancement of examples that can be followed by individuals in their societies. This assumption is also based on Christian beliefs, which are essential in bringing about the creation of a society where individuals are able to live with one another not only in peace, but also make morality the basis of their social environments. In this situation, religion plays a significant role because it ensures that there is a promotion of the power of morality in such a way that helps individuals come up with ways through which they can be able to support one another while at the same time maintaining high moral values.

Among the most significant issues that Browning deals with in his works is are love and knowledge. These are extremely important topics, especially considering that many individuals often seek one or the other, and it shows that throughout history, they have been fundamental human subjects. Knowledge is considered to be the means though which individuals seek to advance themselves in such a way that they are able to learn more concerning their environments (Tate 196). Love, on the other hand, is the feeling of affection that individuals have for one another and it is for the most part based on the unconditional positive feelings that individuals have for others other than themselves. The question of whether to pursue one or another is seen through the manner in which individuals find themselves in a bind because they have difficulty choosing one or the other. However, Browning seems to be of the opinion that individuals who seek knowledge tend to end up in difficult situations because once they begin the process, they are not able to stop. The result is that they bring about their own destruction by the knowledge that they seek to desperately. Love, because of its unconditional nature, can be considered a means through which people can be able to develop the positive feelings that they need to ensure that there is the establishment of an environment where they are comfortable and in harmony with others. Loves unconditional nature is essential in the creation of strong bonds between individuals which ensure that they are able to look out for one another. It makes individuals think beyond themselves, unlike knowledge which can be considered a destructive force if not brought under control swiftly.

“Porphyria’s Lover” is a poem that seems to discuss love and the manner through which without it, the situation can end up leading to brutal situations. This poem begins with the persona describing his lover. This description is extremely important in developing an understanding of the persona’s attitude towards his lover and the manner through which their love has developed. However, in the end, the person strangles his lover in the most brutal manner, essentially using her own blond hair (Browning and Sweeney 3). The poem is an extremely powerful testament of the situation where individuals conduct extremely evil acts in the name of love. The failure to understand the true meaning of love is the root cause of the evil that takes place in this poem and this is to such an extent that it leads the persona into a very dark place. The tone of the poem show that potential that the world has to descend into evil if the power of morality is not applied and it makes the audience think more about their own lives and their potential to conduct great evil if they do not adhere to the moral code that is taught in Christianity. The manner through which the persona describes his love and then ends up murdering her is a sign of the corruption that is prevalent in the world because his actions at the end show him to be an extremely evil person who is not restricted by moral concerns. The lack of a moral compass among human beings because of the corruption of or non-observance of religious teachings can be considered the reason behind the persona’s actions against his lover.

Another poem that touches on the corruption of human nature as well as that of the Church is “The Bishop Orders His Tomb”. This is a poem that seeks to show the manner through which the clergy has descended to the level of promoting their own interests over those of their flock. The title of the poem shows the Bishop as being an extremely vain man because he orders for a tomb to be built for him (Nafchi, Mirzayee and Zadeh 229). It is obvious that this project will involve the use of church funds, which can be put to better use through helping the poor in society. It is essential to understand that the clergymen have to lead by example and Browning, through his poem, shows that the Bishop is an individual who completely goes against his calling to such an extent that he ends up choosing the promotion of his own interests over undertaking the responsibilities that have been given to him as a leader of the Church (Wong 568). This action is a sign of the greater problem that can be found in the Church as a whole, because it shows clergymen in an extremely bad light. These individuals are shown be greedy to such an extent that they fail to observe their vows of poverty and instead seek to achieve earthly goals. These goals are extremely important for these individuals, as exemplified by the Bishop; a sign that the Church has essentially deviated from its purpose and has instead become a means through which clergymen can be able to control considerable wealth while at the same time achieving their personal ambitions.

“Fra Lippo Lippi” is a poem by Browning that essentially seeks to show the considerable power that poets have over the various human subjects that they seek to write about. This poem addresses the issue of corruption in the Church as well as the hypocrisy that goes with it. It is essential to note that the poem makes the point of addressing the excesses of the Church through the use of such aspects of regular life as sex and money (Nafchi, Mirzayee and Zadeh 227). The setting, which is in a dark alley, is highly symbolic of the manner through which the Church, rather than being the source of light, has become a place of darkness. The darkness is symbolic of the corruption of the Church, which has failed to honour its task as the defender of the faith and has instead led to the advancement of a perspective where it is an active player in the corruption of the temporal world. This failure to accomplish its duties leads to a situation where the Church has essentially become corrupt, as seen in the description of the brothel in the alley which symbolises the Church. The Church has essentially become a source of corruption where it seeks such temporal things as money, which it does not use for the benefit of all Christians, and instead is used for the benefit of the clergy.

The Church has essentially become a means to achieve swift wealth and power within society. This is an idea that is shown in the poems discussed above and it leads to the conclusion that members of the clergy are essentially power-hungry individuals who feel that they have the means through which to ensure that they advance their own interests. The selfishness of these individuals can be seen through the god-like characteristics that they adopt, especially when it comes to such issues as the use of expensive regalia in order to impress the masses. The masses are made to believe that the people who hold power in the Church are above them and that they are essentially the representatives of God on earth. A consequence is that these individuals end up using their positions to advance their own power in competition with temporal powers. The splendours seen in the Church and their use by those in power within it shows that there is a lot of corruption. The people in power within the Church have essentially failed to ensure that they pursue the vows of poverty in line with the teachings of Christ, and this is the reason why Browning seems to make plain that they are nothing more than power-hungry individuals.

In conclusion, Browning’s position concerning religion can be considered a very challenging subject. His varying views when it came to religion throughout his life may have come about because of the need to better understand the connection between it and the lives that individuals led in their societies. In this paper, there has been an analysis of the subject through an assessment of his life experiences as well as a number of his works. Browning is an individual who shows signs of having a belief that religion is an essential aspect of society because it leads individuals to achieve a level of morality. It is through the power of morality that they are able to clearly see how the world around them works and the need to advance positive values.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited

Browning, Robert, and Matthew Sweeney. Porphyria's Lover. ProQuest LLC, 2004. Print.

Gale, Cengage Learning. A Study Guide for John Donne's" Song". Gale, Cengage Learning, 2016. Print.

Nafchi, Asghar Moulavi, Mitra Mirzayee, and Morteza Sobhani Zadeh. "Robert Browning: A Dramatic Monologue Marvel." International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 63 (2015): 225-32. Print.

Steward, PA. "The Religious Faith in the Victorian Age." Ashvamegh... the literary flight! 2.19 (2016). Print.

Suzuki, Rieko. "‘What Was All This except the Lesson of Life?’: Browning’s Fifine at the Fair and Shelley." The Keats-Shelley Review 30.1 (2016): 63-69. Print.

Tate, Gregory. "Infinite Movement: Robert Browning and the Dramatic Travelogue." Victorian Poetry 52.2 (2014): 185-203. Print.

Turner, Katie. "Professor Marchbanks English 21 16 April 2004 Tennyson and Browning: Providential Perspectives."  (2004). Print.

Wong, Amy R. "Town Talk and the Cause Célèbre of Robert Browning’s the Ring and the Book." Modern Philology 113.4 (2016): 550-72. Print.

 

Sunday, August 9, 2020

In the Blood by Suzan-Lori Parker

 

In the Blood is a play by Suzan-Lori Parker that focuses on the life of Hester, a woman who lives in poverty and has to struggle every day in order to make ends meet. This is a woman who has five children that have different fathers who she believes have to be supported well in order to have better lives. It is also important for Hester that she advances the lives of her children so that they can have the opportunities that she did not have. She seeks to make sure that she gets the help of her children’s fathers, but this ends up not being possible and she is disappointed. This play shows the manner through which Hester is led by her frustration as well as illiteracy and sense of shame into killing her oldest son.

One of the most fundamental subjects that are discussed in the play is Hester’s illiteracy. While she is an individual that cannot read, she is determined to make sure that her children achieve a level of literacy. However, it is essential to understand that for Hester, her illiteracy must have been an extremely frustrating factor because she was not able to achieve the qualifications that would have made her life better. In addition, she seems to be a highly empathetic individual that seeks to ensure that those around her receive happiness, and forget their troubles. This is the case with the manner through which she ends up giving herself to men in order to console them when having a bad time in their lives.

However, her lack of literacy can be considered a reason behind her eventual murder of her son. When someone scrawls the word ‘slut’ close to where Hester and her family live under a bridge, she is not in a position to read it. Her son, Jabber, who is more literate than his mother, makes the decision not to tell his mother what it means. When Hester learns the truth about the scrawl, she must feel all her frustrations build up until she cannot take it anymore. Her bludgeoning Jabber to death is a means of taking her frustrations out on him to such an extent that she does not think rationally. She is instead governed by her baser emotions which make it extremely difficult for her to realize the consequences of her actions until it is too late.

In conclusion, Hester is an individual that is governed by her emotions to such an extent that she ends up taking an action that she regrets. Her life is essentially a tragedy because it is one that she has to struggle every day in order to make it work. She is involved in acts that are considered loose by other members of her society and this it to such an extent that she is looked upon as a person at the sidelines of the community in which she lives. Therefore, her killing of her son, despite its being deplorable, can be considered a means through which she fights back against the humiliation she feels for being called a slut.

The Narcissism of Minor Differences

 

The narcissism of minor differences is a concept that promotes the idea that human beings have a tendency to want to promote their differences with others rather than similarities. A consequence has been that human beings often seek to ensure that they emphasize on differences to such an extent that there comes a time when they end up in conflict with others who they believe to be different. In this paper, there will be an analysis of the theory of narcissism of minor differences as a nature of humanity, a form of self-identity, a form of uniformity, and finally, its negative effects.

The theory of narcissism of minor differences can be used to effectively explain the aggressive nature of human beings. Individuals tend to seek to enhance the differences between them, even though they may have the same origins, because they seek to advance their aggression towards one another. There is often a failure among them to recognize that rather than being different, they are actually quite similar and this creates a situation where they seek to magnify their differences to such an extent that they create a gap that seems unbridgeable. When this theory is considered from the perspective of human aggression, it explains a lot concerning the manner through which individuals end up not being able to handle being similar to one another because others remind them too much of themselves (Muris, Merckelbach, Otgaar, and Meijer, 2017). It might also be because of the desire to be so different from one another that they do not see their deficiencies; a situation that can be considered a cause of the aggression that they show towards one another. Therefore, minor differences end up becoming extremely pertinent to the lives of individuals because it makes them come to terms with their aggressive nature.

The narcissism of minor differences can also be made use of in determining the manner through which self-identity develops. This is especially the case considering that individuals have ended up forming groups that they believe hold similar characteristics and make them superior to others. A consequence has been that some groups have developed centuries of hatred and aggression towards one another to such an extent that they have not been able to determine the extremely greater number of similarities between them. The case of the Shia and Sunni divide among Muslims is an extreme example of the manner through which the narcissism of minor differences can end up disrupting the lives of individuals to such an extent that the way that they self-identify is based on the minor differences rather than the greater number of similarities between them (Nuruzzaman, 2017). The failure to better understand each other can lead to situations where it is difficult to bridge the divide made from minor differences. This is the case when it comes to the Shia-Sunni divide, which has been ongoing for centuries and has led to a situation where both sides consider themselves to be superior to the other and also look at their counterparts as heretics because they do not have the same minor political beliefs (Van Notten, 2014). They also fail to recognize that despite their minor differences, they both strongly identify as Muslims, and have the same practices of worship that bind all Muslims.

One of the most significant aspects of the narcissism of minor differences is that it involves a situation where despite an emphasis on their uniqueness, they are actually quite similar. Such is the case with societies such as the United States, which consider themselves exceptional because they pride themselves in attributes such as living in a society governed by democratic institutions, the rule of law, and an emphasis on individualism (Fosshage and Hershberg, 2014). However, these attributes tend to be based on more similarities than differences among individuals in society. This is especially considering that because of their beliefs in these attributes and their exceptionalism, rather than emphasizing their differences, these individuals are actually submitting to a form of uniformity. Therefore, without even realizing it, their indulging in the narcissism of minor differences has led individuals towards the bridging of these differences and essentially becoming a more cohesive society. Under such circumstances, it becomes possible for the narcissism of minor differences to act as a means of bringing people together rather than keeping them apart.

The narcissism of minor differences more often than not ends up leading to chaos. Chaos comes about because individuals of similar origins or beliefs are forced into situations where they take on antagonistic positions towards one another. This is to such an extent that they fail to consider their common origins and their similarities and are instead more focused on seeking to advance their differences. The conflict between the Croats and the Serbs is an example of such a situation because these peoples are of a common origin and their languages are so close that they are practically dialects of the same language (Brodić, Amelio, and Milivojević, 2015). However, the enmity and sense of superiority towards one another has led them into conflict that has lasted many years (Reidy, et al, 2015). The chaos that has come about, especially from the attempts of the Serbs to dominate the Croats can be considered the negative result of the narcissism of minor differences because it has led these individuals towards a failure to advance their similarities. Instead, wars have been fought between these two peoples and there has been massive loss of life and property that should not have happened.

In conclusion, the narcissism of minor differences can be considered an extremely destructive force in human societies. This is because it leads individuals towards a false sense of superiority and uniqueness that makes them blind to the similarities that they have with others. A consequence is that it magnifies differences that are virtually nonexistent and makes individuals fail to come together so that their similarities can enable them to build a more cohesive and just society that cater for all their needs. The examples provided above show that getting into a situation where the narcissism of minor differences is prominent is easier than getting out of it.

Pre-Modern and Modern Views of Nature and Death

 

Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson in their poetry address diverse issues concerning nature and death. These are two aspects of life that all human beings have to live with and have to come to terms with the fact that they will have an effect on them. In this paper, there will be an attempt to compare the pre-modern to the modern view of nature through an analysis of the poetry of Whitman and Dickinson.

One of the most important aspects concerning the views of these poets is that they promote the idea that death is essentially something that has to be feared. This is especially considering that in the modern world, people more often than not, because of the adoption of science as the mainstay of everyday life, are afraid of dying. In addition, the concept of nature is one that is seen to be hostile to human beings and that there is need to bring about its taming. The taming of nature is considered an essential aspect of being civilized; meaning that being in touch with nature is viewed as regressive. Therefore, the modernist view concerning nature and death are essentially hostile to both because human beings do not often have control over these aspects of life.

The pre-modern and modern poetry’s views concerning nature and death have a considerable number of similarities. When it comes to death, both views look upon it as an extremely personal experience. This is exemplified in the pre-modern era where there was the belief that death brought about a level of relief from the problems of everyday life. Moreover, it was intensely personal because it was closely tied to religious beliefs in such a way that there was the promotion of life after death. Whitman, in “When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd”, seeks to understand death and questions why God allows it to take place (Whitman). The modern perspective is also fairly personal when it comes to death because it is believed to involve the complete end of a life. In the poetry of both eras, nature is viewed as being beyond the control of human beings, with the latter having to live the best way that they can within it.

Despite the similarities between them, there are considerable differences between the themes involving nature and death in the pre-modern and modern eras. Among the most significant of these is that unlike in the modern era, in the pre-modern era, there was an acceptance of death an inevitable, but this was tempered by the belief that there was life after death. Moreover, acts of nature were believed to be the will of God and because of it could not be questioned. In the modern era, nature is viewed as essentially being hostile to human beings, as seen in Dickinson’s "Apparently with no surprise" where she questions the benevolence of God (Dickinson). This is an important perspective especially the case considering that these beliefs have become influenced by science.

In conclusion, the pre-modern and modern views of death and nature are displayed in the works of Dickinson and Whitman. In the analysis above, there has been an attempt to show the similarities and differences between the beliefs concerning death and nature in these two eras. The result is the realization that despite the similarities and differences, the views were extremely personal.

On the Translation of Culture Specific Concepts

 

In the contemporary world, where there has been an increase in instances of sampling of the literature from a diversity of cultures, translations have become common. This is an important aspect because it is a feature of the globalized world where individuals and cultures have essentially come to be seen as equal (Venuti, 2016). In addition, there has been an inspiration to ensure that there is the advancement of means through which the cultural practices of different peoples are understood. A consequence has been that there have been widespread instances where there is need to ensure that there are translations of texts aimed at bringing about this understanding. One of the biggest features of translations is that there is often language appropriation, where there is the inclusion of foreign words in the text of the language that the text is being translated to. It involves a situation where there is a potential of translations being used in the service of the ideology of the translator (Lefevere, 1992). This is an important means of making sure that there is the advancement of means through which aspects of the culture that is being translated are highlighted. A consequence is that the translated text ends up being interspersed with the text from the original language, which ensures that individuals who read it get a sense of the cultural aspect (Hermans, 2002). This situation can be one that encouraged readers to ensure that they seek to understand the meanings of the various words that have been used in the translated text, and read them in context so that the full meaning of the narrative can be obtained.

Translations into other languages can also face considerable dilemmas when it comes to the rendering of foreign words found in the original text. This is an extremely important procedure because it involves a situation where there is a need to render the foreign words in such a way that advances the retention of their meanings while at the same time making it possible to ensure that the cultural references are also left intact (Haroon and Daud, 2017). In most cases, translators seek to retain the original meaning through the use of approximate words in the language that it is being translated to because it allows the readers to not only effectively understand what is being referenced, but also helps them to come up with a means through which they can understand other cultures with direct reference to their own culture. However, there is often a diversity of translation procedures, and these are determined by the translator involved. In situations where words are difficult to translate and retain the original meaning, some translators choose to make sure that they either maintain the original word during translation, or seek to make use of words that are as close to meaning as possible to the words on the original text (Williams and Chesterman, 2014). In this way, the translation process could end up seeking to ensure that the text remains as faithful as possible to the original text while at the same time allowing for the comprehensibility of the text once the translation process has been completed. Therefore, texts are often translated in a manner that helps target readers comprehend the text that they are reading.

One of the most significant considerations that have to be made by translators is that different cultures tend to influence the way that members of that society perceive the world. This is an important principle when it comes to translation because it ensures that the translator is able to effectively convey the message from the source text to his audience (Maasoum and Davtalab, 2011). In this case, it is essential for all translators to ensure that they have some knowledge concerning the diverse translation strategies that they can apply towards the development of a comprehensive text that not only remains faithful to the original, but is also able to convey the intended message to the audience. Undertaking to translate culture specific items is pertinent to the overall comprehensibility of the text because it allows the translator to capture the original meaning of the text and come up with means through which to promote the cultural meaning of the words that are used. It is also essential for the translator to take note of those culture specific words that are important for the achievement of a true capturing of original meanings (Schmied, 2017). Culture specific words tend to be exclusive to their respective cultures and under these circumstances; the translator has to be extremely careful when rendering translations because they could end up completely changing the original meaning of the text that are translating. Therefore, even though there are words and concepts that are common to all languages, they tend to be expressed differently in certain cultural contexts, meaning that the translator has to follow a strategy that retains its faithfulness to the original text.

One of the main duties of a translator is to select an appropriate means of handling culture specific words and items because it is an essential means of making sure that the translation takes place effectively. The diversity of methods of translating culture specific items is important because they help translators come up with appropriate translations that reflect the cultures that they are referencing (Braçaj, 2015). There are instances where translators have a hard time finding words that completely correspond to the culture specific items or words that are found in original texts. It therefore becomes essential for them to come up with appropriate words that are essential in the advancement of the translation process, and these often either involve undertaking to translate them to their closest approximations, or maintaining the original form while at the same time providing an explanation based in the cultural context of the original text. A consequence of such a situation is that it leads the translated text to have instances where the original text is changed from the original one in order to adapt to the cultural context within which it has been translated (Newmark, 1988). Therefore, the achievement of a translation that essentially remains loyal to the original text, while feasible, can also be elusive because of the different cultural contexts involved in the language. It all depends on the methods used by the translator to come up with the most appropriate translation possible that makes it easier for the reader to understand the text.

Translations can be subject to change from the original text because of cultural differences. This is especially the case considering that languages tend to be subject to their respective cultures, meaning that it would be extremely difficult for the translation of certain items to be translated effectively (House, 2014, Katan, 2014). A consequence is that translators end up in a situation where they are forced to ensure that they convert the text into language that corresponds to the culture that the text is being translated to. There are a number of ways through which a translator can ensure that he conducts an effective translation of the text. The first of these is through the use of borrowing or undertaking a transference procedure. This is a process that involves the use of words or terms that essentially maintain the original forms of the words without any direct translations. In addition, there is the adaptation of two cultural words, which essentially involves a situation where the translator makes the decision to make use of words that correspond to the original words on the original text. Finally, the translator can adapt a procedure where rather than attempting to either use transference or adaptation; he or she can undertake a procedure of describing the cultural word (Wahid and Sukur, 2012). The description of the cultural word is an extremely effective means of making sure that the translation remains as close to the original in meaning as possible.