Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Plato's Euthyphro

 

The theory of forms that is presented in Euthyphro is an extremely important manner of understanding humanity and the way that they make decisions concerning what they believe to be right. It involves a conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro concerning the meaning of piety, with Euthyphro stating that piety involves what one does at a particular time. For example, at the time of his conversation with Socrates, Euthyphro is seeking to prosecute a wrongdoer, who also happens to be his father (Woods & Pack, 2007, p. 2). This is an extremely bold step because it shows that Euthypro is determined to implement the law despite the personal cost to himself and to his family. In addition, the theory of forms is also shown within the conversation through the desire to ensure that there is an understanding of the manner through which individuals can undertake actions that are pleasing to the gods. Determining what is dear to the gods is essential in the process of undertaking actions that upholds this belief. One of the most significant examples that is given during the conversation through which individuals can ensure that they do what pleases the gods is comparing the actions of Zeus against his father Cronos. Zeus punished his own father because of the latter’s tyranny; leading to a situation where Cronos was overthrown and Zeus took up the mantle of the leadership of the gods (Woods & Pack, 2007, p. 4). While this may have been the case, one of the most significant questions that is asked by Socrates is whether actions should be undertake because the gods love it or because the gods love it because it is pious, especially considering that not all the gods have the same beliefs.

One of the most fundamental aspects of the theory of forms as handled in Plato’s Phaedo is that it involves tackling general issues in such a way that they ultimately turn into one or more general ideas. To debate a single issue can lead to a situation where individuals come to find out that there are other significant issues behind it that leads to further debate concerning the issue. This is especially considering a discussion concerning an issue such as the superiority of either fearlessness or goodness. An argument between the opposing sides cannot take place effectively unless both parties have knowledge concerning their respective points. Therefore, without an understanding of what either fearlessness or goodness is, it cannot be possible for them to have a discussion because to do so would be pointless. If they are proffered with a definition of the subject under discussion, but the definition is one that is riddled with criticism, they can be able to ensure that there is a means through which to bring about an understanding of that the definition is not. A consequence is that criticism allows individuals to look into a deeper meaning of the situation that it being discussed in such a way that leads to the achievement of the ultimate truth, where individuals have to act not based on their beliefs, but based on what the end result will likely be. Therefore, while the criticism of a definition that has been proffered can be disheartening, it also provides a way through which better instruction can be given.

Another aspect of the manner through which Plato handles the theory of forms is that some general notions can end up setting ideal limits or standards. The end result is that individuals can be able to ensure that while they deviate slightly from a notion, it does not go too far away that t creates a degree of confusion. A consequence is that individuals are encouraged not to stick too strictly to their beliefs that they fail to consider the other aspects of life around them. What they believe to be true in one case can end up not actually being true in another, as seen in Socrates’ decision to drink the poison himself, and this has to be put in mind if there is to be a level of honesty with oneself (Plato, p. 52). Undertaking such actions is essential in coming up with a sense of morality in society because the motivations of individuals do not necessarily mean that the end result will either be good or bad. Instead, it becomes essential for individuals to not only critically understand their various standpoints, but also to consider the opinions of others in such a way that while they continue to pursue what they believe to be true, they also seek to consider the motivations of others. In this way, it becomes possible to make informed decisions that cater not only to personal needs, but also to the needs of others in society to such an extent that there is a level of harmony. Thus, while discussing or describing an individual as being one that is improving in the achievement of honesty and loyalty, it essentially means that he is getting closer to perfecting honesty and loyalty.

Another fundamental aspect of handling the theory of forms is that it seeks to advance the idea of timeless truths. The knowledge that individuals have concerning the various aspects of everyday life tend to be tensed truths, and these are based on what they believe. A consequence is that it is difficult to determine whether certain notions are either truths or falsehoods and this is to such an extent that there is a potential of knowledge being based on tensed truths or falsehoods. It is therefore necessary to consider all beliefs from various angles in such a way that ensures that while they are believed to be essential truths, they might also be false to such an extent that they end up having a negative effect on the individuals involved. The case of Euthyphro can be applied in this situation because this individual was ready to prosecute his own father based on the belief that Zeus, the chief Greek god, did the same to his own father. He shows a failure to consider how his actions are not only going to affect his father, but him as well because their relationship will be ruined as a result. Therefore, the observance of what are considered as timeless truths from various angles ensures that individuals avoid undertaking certain actions that might end up creating dilemmas for them while at the same time leading them to make serious mistakes that might affect them for the rest of their lives. What is considered as timeless truth cannot be measured based on how long it has been so and can only be accepted as it is.

      The manner through which the ideas that are contained within the theory of forms are addressed can be considered important in understanding the diverse aspects of life. This is especially considering that the theory of forms is ontology of concepts that seek to ensure that there is the creation of means through which a precise definition can be achieved. A result is that it becomes possible to make sure that those concepts that are considered timeless remain so and these in such a way that advances the understanding, which individuals have of them. They are essentially means through which concepts can be rationalized because they exist independently of the real thing or entity. Through the connection or contact that the human mind or soul has with the ordinary things and events that take place in their environment, they can at times end up attaining level of contact with the ideals and objects of the transcendent world to such an extent that it proves the immortality of the soul. This immortality is what can be considered an essential aspect of Plato’s definition of the Forms.

Monday, August 10, 2020

Roland Barthes’ A Lover’s Discourse

 

The subject of love has been a part of human discourse from time immemorial and it has been used as a means of describing the manner through which individuals have emotions and personalities as well as reactions that correspond to the feelings associated with it. It has been studied and recorded in a diverse number of works to such an extent that they have essentially become innumerable. One of the most significant authors on the subject of love is Roland Barthes, who has written quite a lot concerning the effect of love on the intellect, especially the part of the mind that functions as the producer of language. Barthes promotes the idea that love essentially exists through the outpouring of language to such an extent that it is essentially a means through which individuals who are in love share what they feel for one another. Therefore, Barthes, in his A Lover’s Discourse, essentially discusses love as a discourse or language that rather than being analyzed, is an emotion that should be enacted.

A Lover’s Discourse is essentially an attempt to ensure that a discourse concerning love is created in such a way that it is not only dramatized, but also recreated. Therefore, love is essentially a means through which to ensure that there is the advancement of an understanding of love in such a way that promotes its simulation rather than its description. It is a means through which to ensure that there is the development of methods that advances the emotional nature of love rather than analyzing or describing it; which can end up leading to a loss of meaning. For example, in the text, Barthes states that “I-love-you is without nuance. It suppresses explanations, adjustments, degrees, scruples” (Barthes, 1978, p. 148). A consequence is that rather than seeking to associate love with certain characteristics or physical aspects, it becomes essential to make sure that there is the advancement of means through which to bring about the establishment of the emotional aspects of love. Barthes in this work essentially seeks to undertake it not through mediation, but actually seek to show the feelings of the lover himself. A consequence is that there is no intermediary in the process to show how the lover is feeling because the reader ends up delving into the lover’s mind to such an extent that the lover’s emotions are handled firsthand and there is the creation of means through which the readers are better able to understand the lover. In A Lover’s Discourse, Barthes is able to make the reader have a direct discourse with the lover so that the former delves into the emotional state of the latter without the mediation of the writer to describe the emotions that the lover has.

In this particular work, Barthes essentially makes use of language in a transactional manner in such a way that ensures the advancement of how love affects individuals. This is especially the case where the transactional aspect of language is made use of in such a way that ensures that it shows how individuals do things. He goes even deeper by seeking to ensure that he makes use of language to show the declarative and expressive aspects of the lover, as shown where he states, “Industrious, indefatigable, the language machine humming inside me…” (Barthes, 1978, p. 220). In this case, language is essentially used to express meaning in such a way that it does not refer to things, but it instead seeks to advance expressions by virtue of its own structure. A consequence is that a term such as love could stand for not only the feelings that individuals have towards one another, but also the emotional state as well as other feelings that individuals might have. In this circumstance, it becomes possible to ensure that there is the advancement of the interests of such a subject as love in a manner that allows for broader thinking that goes beyond merely describing it, but also seeks to bring about its expressive aspects. Love should therefore be seen as a discussion between individuals where they express and declare their feelings towards each other rather than a situation that focuses merely on the descriptive aspects that tend to essentially be superficial. This focus opens up love into a discourse that is inexhaustible because it is a means through which the expressiveness of the feelings involved can be achieved effectively.

The discourse of love covered in A Lover’s Discourse follows a formula developed by Barthes that seeks to define the way that individuals answer to it. In this discourse, there is an attempt to ensure that the feelings of the lover are portrayed in such a way that the emotional response is one that defines feelings rather than seeking to describe the tangible aspects of love. This is especially the case where he states, “Is not tautology that preposterous state in which are to be found, all values being confounded, the glorious end of the logical operation, the obscenity of stupidity….” (Barthes, 1978, p. 21). The language of love is, in this case, used in order to bring about those aspects that are extremely important to the manner in which individuals connect. The lover’s feelings towards one another are explored in detail to such an extent that the language used allows for the feelings to be described for their own sakes rather than being promoted in such a way that it leads to the advancement of the descriptive aspects that tend to lack the expressive factor. Achieving this goal can be considered Barthes’ most important accomplishment because it ensures that there is the creation of means through which language can be used for its own sake rather than being used in a bid to find meaning. This accomplishment helps in making sure that the reader is able to find out more about the expressions that are associated with love such as its amorous nature that can lead to a diversity of other feelings such as anxiety, the latter coming about when the love given is not requited (Boswell, 2016). Thus, Barthes ensures that rather than undertaking a straight line of thinking that is deductive, he makes use of language to show how love can be expressed in a manner that allows for it to be comment on, contradicted, developed, and exemplified so that the reader can be directly connected to the content.

 In Barthes’ work, the connection between love and language is emphasized considerably because it is a means through which to enhance its expressiveness. Language is considered a means to bring about the establishment of the manner through which individuals are able to express themselves without necessarily seeking to include the conventional aspects that have become predominant when considering love. For example, Barthes states that “Orgasm is not spoken, but it speaks, and it says I-love-you” (Barthes, 1978, p. 149). A careful consideration of this use of language is extremely important because it allows for the establishment of avenues that can be used to reach the audience more effectively. It enables the reader to feel comfortable in showing the expressive nature of love without the constraints that are placed on it through conventions that have been established over time to regulate the manner through which individuals can express themselves. One of the most consequential conclusions that can be made about the use of language, especially when it comes to expressing love, is that it has been developed in such a way that it puts limits to the process so that the individuals involved end up using language in descriptive terms rather than in a manner that makes sure that the entire process is made use of without restrictions (Schmitz, 2017). It seems that the achievement of this goal is what Barthes intends in A Lover’s Discourse because it allows for the advancement of the subject of love through seeking removing all the burdens and descriptiveness that serve as restrictions to fully achieving the potential of the direct connection between language and love. Thus, it is essentially a degree of using language to write in such a way that makes love to be expressed in a mode that is uninflected by utility.

The highly original structure of making use of language that is developed by Barthes ensures that there is greater creativity in the process to such an extent that it becomes possible to express love as it is rather than as it should be. A Lover’s Discourse can be considered a means through which he seeks to ensure that he creates an idea of the complexity of love so that he not only includes the highly involved romantic moments, but also those of anxiety and a lover’s quarrel (Pieters, 2015). Through the use of this means, it becomes possible to ensure that the discourse of love is not editorialized, and it is instead a method that seeks to bring about a diversity of fragments that can be expressed by something other than language. It is essentially a narrative or personal experience that cannot be edited and has the means of enabling the reader or audience to feel a connection with the content because he is able to come to terms with them. The removal of all restrictions that might make language descriptive is important because it ensures that its formal purity is maintained so that when it comes to expressing love, there are no hindrances that can bring about a failure in its expressive nature. In the text, Barthes states that “The third person pronoun is a wicked pronoun: it is the pronoun of the non-person, it absents, it annuls” (Barthes, 1978, p. 185). Therefore, the narrative arc is an important method that Barthes adopts in the discourse because it allows him to make use of language in a way that is above the mundane manner that is it normally used. It instead becomes possible to ensure that such devices as coincidence are avoided at all times so that when creating a narrative, its order essentially belongs to the language itself.

In conclusion, Barthes seeks to promote language as not really having a connection with an object and it instead only has meaning in reference to itself. Thus, love is shown to be an expressive form of language that seeks to advance its more unguided aspects rather than adhering to the conventions of writing that stifles its expressiveness. A Lover’s Discourse essentially overcomes the deficiencies that have been placed on the expressiveness of language to such an extent that it creates a direct connection between the reader and the material that is under discussion. It allows the individual to view the expression of love through language as a means through which its true nature is advanced. This work is an important example of why there is a need to make sure that there is a reduction of restrictions in language that might make it difficult to discuss the subject of love.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Barthes, R. (1978). A Lover's Discourse. New York: Hill and Wang.

Boswell, M. (2016). The Rival Lover: David Foster Wallace and the Anxiety of Influence in Jeffrey Eugenides's The Marriage Plot. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 62(3), 499-518.

Pieters, J. (2015). Fragments of a consolatory discourse: literature and the fiction of comfort. BARTHES STUDIES, 1(2), 123-147.

Schmitz, T. A. (2017). The Rhetoric of Desire in Philostratus's Letters. Arethusa, 50(2), 257-282.

 

Robert Browning's views on religion

 

The views of Robert Browning concerning religion is one of the most fascinating subjects when it comes to the works of Victorian poets. This is because it involves a situation where there is no stable stance on the subject throughout his works to such an extent that there have been radically different views concerning the subject. A prominent aspect of Browning’s poetry is that it shows the ever-shifting attitudes that he has concerning religion and this can be considered an essential part of the various events that took place in his life (Turner 5). It can also be considered a means through which he expressed his inner thoughts concerning the way individuals in society responded to religion. Browning’s works are important because they show that rather than having consistent thoughts about religion, individuals ‘attitudes often change with the events, whether positive or negative, that take place in their lives. These individuals instead seek to make sure that they understand the purpose of religion and the role that it plays in their lives. Browning, through his poetry, challenges the social conformity towards religion that is prevalent in his society and this is to such an extent that very few individuals are able to challenge the institutions of religion. In this paper, there will be an analysis of Robert Browning’s views on religion through an assessment of his life experiences as well as his works, with specific reference to “The Bishop Orders His Tomb”, “Fra Lippo Lippi”, and “Porphyria’s Lover”.

Robert Browning was born in 1812 to a well to do family in England, with his family background being quite extensive because it included German, Scottish, and a paternal grandmother believed to be of mixed origin. He lived in an environment where his parents encouraged him to have considerable freedom of thought to such an extent that he was able to develop independent thought at a very early age. Furthermore, he became interested in the arts from a young age and this was essential in the advancement of his ideas concerning the society within which he lived. Browning’s life was one where because of his father’s good income was able to have an environment and the necessities that he needed to further his career as a poet (Gale). It was fundamental in helping to advance his initiatives because it allowed him to ensure that he made a careful study of his society, mostly because of his mother’s influence, and discover some of the different contradictions that plagued it. He was essentially taught at home because he hated the school environment and did not attend either Oxford or Cambridge because at the time, admission was only allowed for Anglicans while he was raised an evangelical. It is fundamental that Browning became so much involved in addressing the matter of religion in his poetic works, and this is especially the case following his marriage to Elizabeth Barrett, a sickly woman. His marriage was what brought him to the limelight because his wife was more well known in the literary circles at the time, and their decision to move to Italy for the sake of her health can be considered a testament of his love for her.

In his youth, Browning displayed considerable flexibility when it came to his religious beliefs. He was an individual who, despite being raised in a deeply religious environment, with his mother being an evangelical and a non-conformist. She, however, promoted her son’s interests in matters other than religion through her buying him the works of Shelley, who was a well-known atheist. A result was that for a time, Browning, who greatly admired Shelley, became both an atheist and a vegetarian, like his hero (Suzuki 63). However, despite this shift in belief, Browning seems to not have held on to it for a long time and it is possible that his shifting stance in his early youth was essentially a young man trying to find himself. Browning can be considered to have been quite openminded when it came to religious beliefs in his youth and it is this attitude that essentially guided him for the rest of his life. His flexibility when it came to religious beliefs does not seem to have prevented him from undertaking different works and it is possible that he sought to better understand religious beliefs through his works. His religious beliefs, which were at first moulded on that of his own family, must have been significantly challenged by the social realities around him and may have contributed to his not being too attached to conventional beliefs in his life. Therefore, while he may not have remained an atheist for long, Browning seems to have live in a situation where religion did not play a significant role in his youth.

Browning is an individual whose religious beliefs significantly changed as he grew older. This is especially considering that he lived at a time where a considerable number of people essentially conformed to the religious beliefs in which they were raised. However, Browning was among those whose beliefs were everchanging because he had the ability to question and criticise the dominant aspects of religion in his society. Browning’s works show an individual who despite being much concerned with religion did not address it himself. Instead, he made the various characters within his works make their own declarations concerning religion and its purpose. In this way, he was able to ensure that he created a level of debate concerning religion and how it affected the daily lives of individuals. Browning’s religious stance can be considered to have become more consistent as he grew older and during this period, it was affected more by the events that took place in his life rather than being based on any firm religious principles. He was an individual who showed a propensity towards the belief that religion could be a source of good in society and showed an admiration for the manner in which the bible promoted goodness. However, the different events that took place in his life, such as the death of his wife, may have significantly reduced his faith in religion to such an extent that he was seen as having rejected the very idea of its authenticity.

One of the most significant influences on Browning were the works of John Donne. While he had lived in the 17th century, his works were essentially considered little more than uncouth. However, Browning went against the grain by admiring and idolising Donne, much to the surprise of his contemporaries (Gale). Browning’s admiration for Donne may have stemmed from the latter’s quite liberal perspective of the world, which was not popular during his time. His free discussion of such subjects as love and the manner through which he described the various subjects that he wrote about, were considered uncouth during his own time. However, Browning seems to have admired this individuals because of the daring that he had in being able to challenge the social conventions of the seventeenth century and seeking to think outside of the religious and social restrictions that had been placed on individuals in the society. Browning can be considered to also have been a liberal in a period where there seem to have been considerable social restrictions in addition to open hostility when it came to individuals going against what were considered correct religious practices. Therefore, Donne’s influence of Browning cannot be underestimated since it may have been the catalyst that made the latter venture into the way of thinking, in a liberal manner, that served as a hallmark of his works. Donne’s poetry also seems to have been responsible for the style that was later adopted by Browning in his own poetic works. Therefore, Donne was an important influence on Browning because the latter idolised him and his way of thinking, and this influence may have also been important when it came to Browning’s opinions concerning society and the role of religion within it.

The image of Faust plays a prominent role in the poetry of Robert Browning. This is because he is used to symbolise the poet, as is the case where this individual uses unconventional means to achieve his goals. Faust’s use of black magic, and the manner through which Browning makes him a symbol of the poet shown that the latter may have been experiencing a situation where his religious beliefs had taken a downturn. Faust’s life is highly symbolic of the need by human beings to take responsibility for their own lives and do what they can to ensure that they are in full possession of their destinies. Faust is therefore symbolic of the ability of human beings to control their lives without the intervention of religion. However, Browning seems to have lost interest in using Faust to symbolise the poet, with this role being given to Elisha. It shows that the considerable reversal that Browning experiences when it comes to his opinion concerning religion. When one considers that Faust was eventually condemned for his actions, his replacement by Elisha is extremely important. Elisha’s miracle, where he resurrected the son of the Shunamite woman is consistent with Browning’s regaining of his religious beliefs. It is symbolic of the revival of those instances where individuals, after having lose their faith and regained it, constantly seek to ensure that they attain the highest possible level of religious observance. Faust and Elisha in this case can be considered symbolic of the opposite religious inclinations that affect Browning from throughout his life.

Moreover, Browning is shown to be an individual who considered death to be imminent for all individuals. His works show a significant attempt to address death and the manner that it comes about. Therefore, while the world is a beautiful place to live in, despite the problems that can be found within it, it is inevitable that death will eventually find us and that with death, the world will cease to be of any use. Browning’s opinion of death can be seen in the way that he seems to be abandoning the prophetic role that he undertook when he me Elisha the representation of the poet. This abandonment is extremely symbolic of Browning’s significant belief that death will eventually come and that human beings do not have the power to resist it. The achievement of the goals of religion is to ensure that there is the advancement of the lives of individuals in such a way that they are able to achieve salvation after their deaths. Therefore, it is essential that humans seek to redeem themselves because at death, the beauty of the world opens up, and despite the desire to continue living within it, death denies them the ability to achieve this objective. It is possible that Browning was of the belief that human beings had to make the most of being alive through undertaking those tasks that they believed to be important while at the same time living righteously. This is especially considering that death is constantly imminent and it is likely to come about without warning.

It seems that Browning believes individuals in the world can only be able to achieve salvation through the observance of divine love. He further suggests that human beings are constantly shown evidence of divine power, but while the latter is in evidence, there is a failure to realise that it is important for it to be tempered with divine love (Steward). A consequence of this stance is that it promotes the belief that individuals should take responsibility for their actions in such a way that it allows them to view the world differently. It is likely that Browning is essentially condemning the selfish nature of human beings because he suggests that individuals do not do enough to promote the advancement of love in their societies. They instead seek to ensure that they accomplish their own selfish interests at the expense of others. The matter of salvation can also be considered a means through which Browning condemns the church establishment, especially the monopoly of power that is displayed by clergymen. The latter are essentially representations of all that is wrong with the world because rather than promoting the idea of divine love in society, they cause the considerable restrictions within it based on doctrinal differences. Thus, salvation can only be achieved through individual action, which is essential in the advancement of love in such a way that it becomes one of the sole purposes of human beings. A consequence would be that evidence of divine power tempered with that of divine love would ensure that salvation becomes a reality for a considerable number of individuals.

Browning is an individual who believes in the power of morality. It is an important belief because he believed in the artists making use of their works to advance morality. This is fundamental because the process involved artists being able to undertake the role of social conscience in their societies. Furthermore, when it came to morality, Browning often made use of biblical allusions to get his point across to his audience. He seems to advance the need to make sure that a situation is brought about where society is able to learn from the work of artists concerning the need to lead moral lives. The achievement of this goal can be considered fundamental because it shows the artist as not only an individual who entertains his audience, but also provides them with essential moral lessons concerning life. Browning sees his role as a poet as a means of lending society with the knowledge that they need to live morally while at the same time ensuring that there is the advancement of examples that can be followed by individuals in their societies. This assumption is also based on Christian beliefs, which are essential in bringing about the creation of a society where individuals are able to live with one another not only in peace, but also make morality the basis of their social environments. In this situation, religion plays a significant role because it ensures that there is a promotion of the power of morality in such a way that helps individuals come up with ways through which they can be able to support one another while at the same time maintaining high moral values.

Among the most significant issues that Browning deals with in his works is are love and knowledge. These are extremely important topics, especially considering that many individuals often seek one or the other, and it shows that throughout history, they have been fundamental human subjects. Knowledge is considered to be the means though which individuals seek to advance themselves in such a way that they are able to learn more concerning their environments (Tate 196). Love, on the other hand, is the feeling of affection that individuals have for one another and it is for the most part based on the unconditional positive feelings that individuals have for others other than themselves. The question of whether to pursue one or another is seen through the manner in which individuals find themselves in a bind because they have difficulty choosing one or the other. However, Browning seems to be of the opinion that individuals who seek knowledge tend to end up in difficult situations because once they begin the process, they are not able to stop. The result is that they bring about their own destruction by the knowledge that they seek to desperately. Love, because of its unconditional nature, can be considered a means through which people can be able to develop the positive feelings that they need to ensure that there is the establishment of an environment where they are comfortable and in harmony with others. Loves unconditional nature is essential in the creation of strong bonds between individuals which ensure that they are able to look out for one another. It makes individuals think beyond themselves, unlike knowledge which can be considered a destructive force if not brought under control swiftly.

“Porphyria’s Lover” is a poem that seems to discuss love and the manner through which without it, the situation can end up leading to brutal situations. This poem begins with the persona describing his lover. This description is extremely important in developing an understanding of the persona’s attitude towards his lover and the manner through which their love has developed. However, in the end, the person strangles his lover in the most brutal manner, essentially using her own blond hair (Browning and Sweeney 3). The poem is an extremely powerful testament of the situation where individuals conduct extremely evil acts in the name of love. The failure to understand the true meaning of love is the root cause of the evil that takes place in this poem and this is to such an extent that it leads the persona into a very dark place. The tone of the poem show that potential that the world has to descend into evil if the power of morality is not applied and it makes the audience think more about their own lives and their potential to conduct great evil if they do not adhere to the moral code that is taught in Christianity. The manner through which the persona describes his love and then ends up murdering her is a sign of the corruption that is prevalent in the world because his actions at the end show him to be an extremely evil person who is not restricted by moral concerns. The lack of a moral compass among human beings because of the corruption of or non-observance of religious teachings can be considered the reason behind the persona’s actions against his lover.

Another poem that touches on the corruption of human nature as well as that of the Church is “The Bishop Orders His Tomb”. This is a poem that seeks to show the manner through which the clergy has descended to the level of promoting their own interests over those of their flock. The title of the poem shows the Bishop as being an extremely vain man because he orders for a tomb to be built for him (Nafchi, Mirzayee and Zadeh 229). It is obvious that this project will involve the use of church funds, which can be put to better use through helping the poor in society. It is essential to understand that the clergymen have to lead by example and Browning, through his poem, shows that the Bishop is an individual who completely goes against his calling to such an extent that he ends up choosing the promotion of his own interests over undertaking the responsibilities that have been given to him as a leader of the Church (Wong 568). This action is a sign of the greater problem that can be found in the Church as a whole, because it shows clergymen in an extremely bad light. These individuals are shown be greedy to such an extent that they fail to observe their vows of poverty and instead seek to achieve earthly goals. These goals are extremely important for these individuals, as exemplified by the Bishop; a sign that the Church has essentially deviated from its purpose and has instead become a means through which clergymen can be able to control considerable wealth while at the same time achieving their personal ambitions.

“Fra Lippo Lippi” is a poem by Browning that essentially seeks to show the considerable power that poets have over the various human subjects that they seek to write about. This poem addresses the issue of corruption in the Church as well as the hypocrisy that goes with it. It is essential to note that the poem makes the point of addressing the excesses of the Church through the use of such aspects of regular life as sex and money (Nafchi, Mirzayee and Zadeh 227). The setting, which is in a dark alley, is highly symbolic of the manner through which the Church, rather than being the source of light, has become a place of darkness. The darkness is symbolic of the corruption of the Church, which has failed to honour its task as the defender of the faith and has instead led to the advancement of a perspective where it is an active player in the corruption of the temporal world. This failure to accomplish its duties leads to a situation where the Church has essentially become corrupt, as seen in the description of the brothel in the alley which symbolises the Church. The Church has essentially become a source of corruption where it seeks such temporal things as money, which it does not use for the benefit of all Christians, and instead is used for the benefit of the clergy.

The Church has essentially become a means to achieve swift wealth and power within society. This is an idea that is shown in the poems discussed above and it leads to the conclusion that members of the clergy are essentially power-hungry individuals who feel that they have the means through which to ensure that they advance their own interests. The selfishness of these individuals can be seen through the god-like characteristics that they adopt, especially when it comes to such issues as the use of expensive regalia in order to impress the masses. The masses are made to believe that the people who hold power in the Church are above them and that they are essentially the representatives of God on earth. A consequence is that these individuals end up using their positions to advance their own power in competition with temporal powers. The splendours seen in the Church and their use by those in power within it shows that there is a lot of corruption. The people in power within the Church have essentially failed to ensure that they pursue the vows of poverty in line with the teachings of Christ, and this is the reason why Browning seems to make plain that they are nothing more than power-hungry individuals.

In conclusion, Browning’s position concerning religion can be considered a very challenging subject. His varying views when it came to religion throughout his life may have come about because of the need to better understand the connection between it and the lives that individuals led in their societies. In this paper, there has been an analysis of the subject through an assessment of his life experiences as well as a number of his works. Browning is an individual who shows signs of having a belief that religion is an essential aspect of society because it leads individuals to achieve a level of morality. It is through the power of morality that they are able to clearly see how the world around them works and the need to advance positive values.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Works Cited

Browning, Robert, and Matthew Sweeney. Porphyria's Lover. ProQuest LLC, 2004. Print.

Gale, Cengage Learning. A Study Guide for John Donne's" Song". Gale, Cengage Learning, 2016. Print.

Nafchi, Asghar Moulavi, Mitra Mirzayee, and Morteza Sobhani Zadeh. "Robert Browning: A Dramatic Monologue Marvel." International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 63 (2015): 225-32. Print.

Steward, PA. "The Religious Faith in the Victorian Age." Ashvamegh... the literary flight! 2.19 (2016). Print.

Suzuki, Rieko. "‘What Was All This except the Lesson of Life?’: Browning’s Fifine at the Fair and Shelley." The Keats-Shelley Review 30.1 (2016): 63-69. Print.

Tate, Gregory. "Infinite Movement: Robert Browning and the Dramatic Travelogue." Victorian Poetry 52.2 (2014): 185-203. Print.

Turner, Katie. "Professor Marchbanks English 21 16 April 2004 Tennyson and Browning: Providential Perspectives."  (2004). Print.

Wong, Amy R. "Town Talk and the Cause Célèbre of Robert Browning’s the Ring and the Book." Modern Philology 113.4 (2016): 550-72. Print.

 

Sunday, August 9, 2020

In the Blood by Suzan-Lori Parker

 

In the Blood is a play by Suzan-Lori Parker that focuses on the life of Hester, a woman who lives in poverty and has to struggle every day in order to make ends meet. This is a woman who has five children that have different fathers who she believes have to be supported well in order to have better lives. It is also important for Hester that she advances the lives of her children so that they can have the opportunities that she did not have. She seeks to make sure that she gets the help of her children’s fathers, but this ends up not being possible and she is disappointed. This play shows the manner through which Hester is led by her frustration as well as illiteracy and sense of shame into killing her oldest son.

One of the most fundamental subjects that are discussed in the play is Hester’s illiteracy. While she is an individual that cannot read, she is determined to make sure that her children achieve a level of literacy. However, it is essential to understand that for Hester, her illiteracy must have been an extremely frustrating factor because she was not able to achieve the qualifications that would have made her life better. In addition, she seems to be a highly empathetic individual that seeks to ensure that those around her receive happiness, and forget their troubles. This is the case with the manner through which she ends up giving herself to men in order to console them when having a bad time in their lives.

However, her lack of literacy can be considered a reason behind her eventual murder of her son. When someone scrawls the word ‘slut’ close to where Hester and her family live under a bridge, she is not in a position to read it. Her son, Jabber, who is more literate than his mother, makes the decision not to tell his mother what it means. When Hester learns the truth about the scrawl, she must feel all her frustrations build up until she cannot take it anymore. Her bludgeoning Jabber to death is a means of taking her frustrations out on him to such an extent that she does not think rationally. She is instead governed by her baser emotions which make it extremely difficult for her to realize the consequences of her actions until it is too late.

In conclusion, Hester is an individual that is governed by her emotions to such an extent that she ends up taking an action that she regrets. Her life is essentially a tragedy because it is one that she has to struggle every day in order to make it work. She is involved in acts that are considered loose by other members of her society and this it to such an extent that she is looked upon as a person at the sidelines of the community in which she lives. Therefore, her killing of her son, despite its being deplorable, can be considered a means through which she fights back against the humiliation she feels for being called a slut.

The Narcissism of Minor Differences

 

The narcissism of minor differences is a concept that promotes the idea that human beings have a tendency to want to promote their differences with others rather than similarities. A consequence has been that human beings often seek to ensure that they emphasize on differences to such an extent that there comes a time when they end up in conflict with others who they believe to be different. In this paper, there will be an analysis of the theory of narcissism of minor differences as a nature of humanity, a form of self-identity, a form of uniformity, and finally, its negative effects.

The theory of narcissism of minor differences can be used to effectively explain the aggressive nature of human beings. Individuals tend to seek to enhance the differences between them, even though they may have the same origins, because they seek to advance their aggression towards one another. There is often a failure among them to recognize that rather than being different, they are actually quite similar and this creates a situation where they seek to magnify their differences to such an extent that they create a gap that seems unbridgeable. When this theory is considered from the perspective of human aggression, it explains a lot concerning the manner through which individuals end up not being able to handle being similar to one another because others remind them too much of themselves (Muris, Merckelbach, Otgaar, and Meijer, 2017). It might also be because of the desire to be so different from one another that they do not see their deficiencies; a situation that can be considered a cause of the aggression that they show towards one another. Therefore, minor differences end up becoming extremely pertinent to the lives of individuals because it makes them come to terms with their aggressive nature.

The narcissism of minor differences can also be made use of in determining the manner through which self-identity develops. This is especially the case considering that individuals have ended up forming groups that they believe hold similar characteristics and make them superior to others. A consequence has been that some groups have developed centuries of hatred and aggression towards one another to such an extent that they have not been able to determine the extremely greater number of similarities between them. The case of the Shia and Sunni divide among Muslims is an extreme example of the manner through which the narcissism of minor differences can end up disrupting the lives of individuals to such an extent that the way that they self-identify is based on the minor differences rather than the greater number of similarities between them (Nuruzzaman, 2017). The failure to better understand each other can lead to situations where it is difficult to bridge the divide made from minor differences. This is the case when it comes to the Shia-Sunni divide, which has been ongoing for centuries and has led to a situation where both sides consider themselves to be superior to the other and also look at their counterparts as heretics because they do not have the same minor political beliefs (Van Notten, 2014). They also fail to recognize that despite their minor differences, they both strongly identify as Muslims, and have the same practices of worship that bind all Muslims.

One of the most significant aspects of the narcissism of minor differences is that it involves a situation where despite an emphasis on their uniqueness, they are actually quite similar. Such is the case with societies such as the United States, which consider themselves exceptional because they pride themselves in attributes such as living in a society governed by democratic institutions, the rule of law, and an emphasis on individualism (Fosshage and Hershberg, 2014). However, these attributes tend to be based on more similarities than differences among individuals in society. This is especially considering that because of their beliefs in these attributes and their exceptionalism, rather than emphasizing their differences, these individuals are actually submitting to a form of uniformity. Therefore, without even realizing it, their indulging in the narcissism of minor differences has led individuals towards the bridging of these differences and essentially becoming a more cohesive society. Under such circumstances, it becomes possible for the narcissism of minor differences to act as a means of bringing people together rather than keeping them apart.

The narcissism of minor differences more often than not ends up leading to chaos. Chaos comes about because individuals of similar origins or beliefs are forced into situations where they take on antagonistic positions towards one another. This is to such an extent that they fail to consider their common origins and their similarities and are instead more focused on seeking to advance their differences. The conflict between the Croats and the Serbs is an example of such a situation because these peoples are of a common origin and their languages are so close that they are practically dialects of the same language (Brodić, Amelio, and Milivojević, 2015). However, the enmity and sense of superiority towards one another has led them into conflict that has lasted many years (Reidy, et al, 2015). The chaos that has come about, especially from the attempts of the Serbs to dominate the Croats can be considered the negative result of the narcissism of minor differences because it has led these individuals towards a failure to advance their similarities. Instead, wars have been fought between these two peoples and there has been massive loss of life and property that should not have happened.

In conclusion, the narcissism of minor differences can be considered an extremely destructive force in human societies. This is because it leads individuals towards a false sense of superiority and uniqueness that makes them blind to the similarities that they have with others. A consequence is that it magnifies differences that are virtually nonexistent and makes individuals fail to come together so that their similarities can enable them to build a more cohesive and just society that cater for all their needs. The examples provided above show that getting into a situation where the narcissism of minor differences is prominent is easier than getting out of it.