There
are a number of structural indicators that are used to identify if individuals
are happy. These essentially include social indicators and structural processes
which are used as a means of understanding the manner through which individuals
are able to attain happiness. They are highly subjective to such an extent that
they lead to a situation where some theories have developed that promotes the
idea that happiness is superficial. Marx and Durkheim, for example, developed
theories that suggest that happiness is superficial and that it is based on the
consumerist culture that creates a false illusion or the promise of happiness (Cieslik, 2015). A consequence is that happiness is seen as a
concept that seeks to hide the reality of the lives of individuals, such as the
concept of suffering and how it comes about.
From
a symbolic interactionist perspective, happiness is essentially a means through
which to ensure that the power relations in society are enforced. This is
especially the case considering that a considerable number of definitions of
happiness have come to be associated with consumerism, and this has become an
essential part of accepted social behavior. The achievement of happiness is one
of the biggest goals of members of society because it has come to be associated
with wellbeing. From a symbolic interactionist perspective, happiness is
closely tied to wellbeing and it is the reason behind the establishment of
relations between individuals across society (Cieslik, 2015). The pursuit of happiness is what has
essentially become the means through which the current social order has been
established.
For
a considerable number of interviewees, their ideal form of happiness was one
where they were allowed to pursue their own happiness. However, they were more
likely than not to encounter pressure from their parents, who often sought to
ensure that their children adopted their own notions of the ideal forms of
happiness (Cieslik, 2015). A consequence was that the interviewees’
notions of happiness were formed from a diversity of influences, not only from
their home environments, but also from other factors that were considered
important in their lives. These were especially the case when it came to the
way that they identified themselves and their own notions of what happiness
actually meant for them.
Cieslik
argues that individuals both feel and do happiness, and this is a concept that
promotes the idea that human beings aim at attaining happiness. Feeling
happiness involves getting pleasure out of an action that an individual has
undertaken or has had undertaken for them. Doing happiness, on the other hand,
involves actively seeking out activities that are aimed at bringing about the
feeling of happiness. Human beings often go about their lives undertaking
activities that they believe will bring them the most happiness such as having
friends, jobs, and living in environments that will ensure that they are made
happy. A consequence of this situation is that individuals form relationships
that are narrowly focused on how other people can be able to satisfy the sense
of wellbeing that is often associated with happiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment