Literary Analysis · Science Fiction · Postcolonial Criticism
The Fantasy Made Flesh, and Found Monstrous
Philip José Farmer's Lord Tyger asks what would actually happen if someone tried to build the Tarzan fantasy in the real world. The answer indicts the villain, the original author, and the reader in equal measure.
Book Under Analysis
Lord Tyger
One of the most audacious and unsettling works of science fiction and literary deconstruction of its era — a novel that takes the Tarzan fantasy apart with surgical precision and asks what it would actually look like if someone tried to build it in the real world.
I
The Central Premise and Its Implications
The novel's engine is a single, disturbing conceit. A fabulously wealthy and obsessive man — Eivob Ras Treece — has spent enormous resources constructing an artificial jungle environment in Africa and has raised a boy, Ras, inside it from infancy. The goal is to create, in reality, the figure of Tarzan: a nobleman of European blood, raised by animals in wild Africa, destined to become the perfect physical and moral specimen that Edgar Rice Burroughs imagined. Treece is not a scientist conducting an experiment in any neutral sense. He is a fan — consumed, deranged, and ultimately criminal — who has decided that the fantasy should be real and has used a human being as his instrument.
What makes Lord Tyger so powerful as a novel — and so disquieting to read — is that Farmer does not treat this premise as merely eccentric. He treats it as monstrous. Ras's entire existence has been stage-managed: the people around him are paid actors playing scripted roles, the animals are placed and removed according to the needs of the narrative being constructed, and Ras himself is observed, recorded, and curated as though he were a character in someone else's story — which, of course, he is.
This is Farmer's founding move: to show us the backstage machinery of the fantasy we have been enjoying, and to insist that the machinery is not neutral. It is built on exploitation. It runs on a human being who did not consent to be its engine.
II
Farmer and the Tarzan Obsession
To understand Lord Tyger fully, it helps to understand where it sits within Farmer's broader engagement with the Tarzan legend — a relationship that was simultaneously one of affection and ferocious critical energy. Farmer returned to Tarzan repeatedly across his career, producing a body of work that amounts to the most sustained literary interrogation of the adventure hero tradition in American genre fiction.
Farmer's Tarzan Triptych
- A Feast Unknown (1969) — Transgressive parody presenting a barely-disguised Tarzan in explicitly sexual and violent scenarios, stripping the hero of his clean, sanitised mythic status
- Lord Tyger (1970) — Psychological novel; slower, more patient, more interested in what it actually feels like to be the person inside the myth
- Tarzan Alive (1972) — Mock biography treating the ape-man as a real historical figure, completing the trilogy's arc from deconstruction to taxonomy
Where A Feast Unknown operated as transgressive parody, Lord Tyger is a psychological novel — slower, more patient, more interested in what it actually feels like to be the person inside the myth. Ras is not Tarzan in disguise. He is what Tarzan would be: confused, violent, sexually complex, unmoored, and ultimately betrayed by the people who claimed to be shaping him toward greatness.
Taken together, these three works constitute a sustained inquiry into what the Tarzan fantasy means — what it says about race, empire, masculinity, and the ethics of storytelling — that has no real parallel in genre fiction of the period.
III
Nature, Nurture, and the Myth of Aristocratic Blood
The original Burroughs Tarzan is built on a biological fantasy: that noble English blood, even raised among animals with no education or civilisation, will naturally produce a superior being. Tarzan is stronger, smarter, more ethical, and more naturally suited to leadership than the Africans around him — not because of anything he has done or learned, but because of what he is. This is the racial and class ideology of Edwardian imperialism rendered as adventure entertainment.
Farmer's Lord Tyger does not simply reject this premise. It probes it. Ras has been constructed to embody it — he has been given the "right" lineage, the "right" environment, the "right" physical challenges. And yet what emerges is not the noble savage of Burroughs's imagination. What emerges is a damaged human being whose sense of identity is entirely artificial, whose relationships are all performances, and whose "natural" superiority is a fiction maintained at enormous cost by a network of deception.
IV
The Ethics of Observation and the Reader's Complicity
One of the novel's most quietly devastating moves is its implication of the reader in Treece's project. Treece watches Ras the way readers watch fictional characters: with investment, with desire for certain outcomes, and with a fundamental disregard for the character's interiority beyond what serves the story. When Ras suffers, Treece is disappointed or adjusts the script. When Ras performs heroically, Treece is gratified. The relationship is that of an author to a character — except the character is a real human being who bleeds.
The act of consuming Tarzan stories involves a similar dynamic: taking pleasure in the performance of a figure whose psychological reality, whose pain, whose full humanity, is never the point. The narrative exists to gratify the reader's fantasy. Treece has simply removed the metaphorical distance and made the exploitation literal.
This is a confrontational argument, and Farmer does not make it with the comfort of distance. He embeds it in the texture of the novel, in Ras's confusion and suffering, and lets the reader feel the implications rather than simply stating them. The reader who recognises themselves in Treece's position — who has been leaning forward, hoping Ras will succeed, wanting the myth to work — is the reader Farmer is most interested in catching.
V
Colonialism and the African Setting
The African jungle setting — borrowed wholesale from Burroughs — carries with it the full freight of colonial fantasy. In the original Tarzan stories, Africa is backdrop: a space of danger and resource, populated by figures who exist to be saved, threatened, or subordinated by the white protagonist. The African characters in Burroughs are largely indistinguishable from the landscape — they are part of the environment Tarzan masters, not people with histories, interiority, or claims on the narrative.
Lord Tyger does not simply reproduce this. Farmer is conscious of it, and the novel's construction — in which a European obsessive has literally reshaped an African space to serve his fantasy — makes the colonial logic of the original explicit and damning. Treece has done, in miniature and with deliberate intent, what European colonialism did to Africa at scale: imposed a foreign narrative onto the land and its inhabitants, and used actual human beings to perform roles within it.
Ras's position is itself colonial: he is the white figure of mastery, placed in Africa by a European patron, surrounded by Africans whose roles are scripted and subordinated. That the entire apparatus is fake does not make the colonial structure less real — it makes it more visible. The scaffolding shows.
VI
Sexuality and the Body
Farmer was unusual among science fiction writers of his generation in his willingness to write about sex with directness and psychological seriousness. Lord Tyger is not an exception. Ras's sexual awakening and development are rendered explicitly and without the euphemism that characterised both the Burroughs original and most genre fiction of the era.
This is not gratuitous. Farmer's point is that the sanitised heroism of the Tarzan fantasy depends on the suppression of the body — on a hero who is all physical prowess and moral clarity, with sexuality either absent or reduced to the chivalric protection of a white woman. By restoring the body to the narrative, Farmer dismantles one of the key mechanisms by which the original fantasy maintains its ideological cleanness.
The body, in Farmer's telling, is the site of truth. What the body wants, what the body endures, what the body reveals about the gap between the myth and the human being inside it — this is where Burroughs's fantasy finally collapses, and where Lord Tyger does its most serious work.
VII
Identity, Authenticity, and the Discovery of the Frame
The novel's narrative arc moves toward Ras's discovery of the truth of his situation. The revelation — that everything he has known has been staged, that the people around him are performers, that he is the subject of an obsessive's fantasy project — is the moment when the Tarzan myth collapses from the inside.
What is striking is that Farmer does not resolve this collapse cleanly. Ras does not emerge from the revelation as a liberated, coherent self. He is left with the question that haunts the novel from its opening pages: if everything that formed you was constructed, who are you? If your identity is entirely the product of someone else's fantasy, what remains when the fantasy is stripped away?
This is Farmer's deepest question, and it is one that extends beyond Ras. It extends to every reader who has consumed popular fiction and taken pleasure in the construction of a hero — and who has not examined what that pleasure costs, and who it costs it to. The novel ends not with an answer but with the weight of the question, which is exactly where it should end.
Final Assessment
A Difficult, Rewarding, and Long-Undervalued Novel
Lord Tyger is a difficult, rewarding, and often uncomfortable novel. It rewards close reading and benefits enormously from familiarity with the Burroughs Tarzan tradition it is dissecting — though it can stand alone as a work of psychological fiction. Its critical project is serious and executed with real intelligence.
The novel has not received the sustained critical attention it deserves. It sits at the intersection of genre fiction and literary critique in a way that makes it hard to categorise, and its explicit sexuality has historically limited its academic reception. But as a work of metafictional inquiry — as a novel that uses the tools of popular fiction to interrogate the ethics of popular fiction — it is one of the more significant works of American science fiction of the 1970s.
Farmer is not content to simply satirise Burroughs. He is interested in what the Tarzan fantasy reveals about its readers, its cultural moment, and its ideological assumptions. That interest, pursued with honesty and without sentimentality, is what makes Lord Tyger worth reading more than fifty years after its publication — and what ensures it will reward rereading long after more celebrated novels of its era have faded.
0 Comments